Tell me about a time you had to resolve a conflict between a principal investigator (PI) and a research nurse regarding patient care or protocol adherence in a clinical trial. How did you approach the situation, what actions did you take, and what was the outcome?
final round · 5-7 minutes
How to structure your answer
I would approach this using the CIRCLES Method for conflict resolution. First, I'd 'Comprehend' the perspectives of both the PI and the research nurse separately, identifying core concerns. Next, I'd 'Identify' common ground and areas of divergence. Then, I'd 'Report' the objective facts of the protocol and patient safety guidelines. I would 'Create' options for resolution, emphasizing patient well-being and protocol integrity. I'd 'Leverage' institutional policies and ethical guidelines to guide the discussion. Finally, I'd 'Execute' the agreed-upon solution, ensuring clear communication and documentation, and 'Summarize' the resolution and preventative measures for future conflicts.
Sample answer
In a critical cardiovascular device trial, I encountered a conflict where the PI wanted to administer an off-label medication for a patient's emergent condition, believing it was in the patient's best interest, while the research nurse correctly highlighted that it was a direct protocol violation. My approach was rooted in the CIRCLES method. I first met with each party individually to fully 'Comprehend' their perspectives and underlying concerns – the PI's focus on immediate patient welfare versus the nurse's commitment to protocol integrity and data validity. I then 'Identified' the specific protocol section regarding concomitant medications and emergency procedures. I 'Reported' the objective facts, referencing the approved protocol and ICH-GCP guidelines. Together, we 'Created' options, including contacting the sponsor for an urgent amendment or exploring on-label alternatives. We 'Leveraged' the trial's safety monitoring plan. The 'Execution' involved the PI agreeing to contact the sponsor, who approved a compassionate use amendment within 48 hours. This 'Summarized' resolution maintained patient safety, ensured protocol adherence, and prevented a major deviation, preserving the integrity of the trial data.
Key points to mention
- • STAR method application (Situation, Task, Action, Result)
- • Specific protocol section or guideline referenced (e.g., ICH-GCP, 21 CFR Part 312)
- • Involvement of relevant stakeholders (e.g., medical monitor, sponsor, IRB/EC)
- • Documentation of the conflict and resolution
- • Emphasis on patient safety and data integrity
- • Proactive measures taken to prevent future occurrences (e.g., SOP review, training)
Common mistakes to avoid
- ✗ Taking sides or appearing biased
- ✗ Failing to reference specific guidelines or protocols
- ✗ Not involving appropriate external stakeholders (e.g., sponsor, medical monitor)
- ✗ Lack of documentation of the conflict and resolution
- ✗ Focusing solely on the conflict without detailing the resolution and its impact